A recently published article by Frank et al. titled “Exploitation drives an ontogenetic-like deepening in marine fish” claim that the deepening of large individuals commonly observed in exploited marine fish species is driven by fishing pressure. These conclusions fundamentally challenge our current understanding of ontogenetic deepening in marine fishes, including a range of hypotheses that have been put forward to explain it (optimal foraging, optimal temperature, avoidance of predation mortality) and have significant implications for the use of species’ deepening as an indicator of warming seas. However, Frank et al.’s findings are based on a single exploited stock, and in a region where sea temperatures have remained within the species thermal preference range. If Frank et al.’s findings are widely applicable, then the depth at which large fish are observed should correlate positively with fishing intensity in other stock as well. Here we have performed a brief statistical analysis on several Northeast Atlantic fish stocks which experienced varying degrees of fishing exploitation. Our results showed no evidence that ontogenetic deepening became less evident with declining fishing intensity. If anything the depth was negatively correlated with fishing, meaning that as fishing mortality dropped the ontogenetic deepening was more evident. This questions the universality of Frank et al.‘s findings and challenges their conclusion that the deepening of marine species may not be an adequate indicator of warming seas.