Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Felsefî Değişimler ve Modern Edebî Eleştiri Metotlarına Etkisi

Authors: MUHAMMED İBRAHİM, Desûki İbrahim;

Felsefî Değişimler ve Modern Edebî Eleştiri Metotlarına Etkisi

Abstract

ÖZET Felsefî Değişimler ve Modern Edebî Eleştiri Metotlarına Etkisi Bu araştırma, modern edebi eleştirinin gelişmesine yol açan felsefî değişim ve gelişmeleri ele almaktadır. Bu eleştirinin, uygulama ilkelerindeki metotları bu değişim ve gelişmeler üzerine kurulmuş ve bu kuruluş edebi sanatların önceden olduğundan daha büyük bir dikkatle okunup incelenmesi hususunda büyük bir gelişmeye neden olmuştur. Yapısalcılık, üslupçuluk, algılama teorisi, çözümleme, metin bilgisi ve kültürel eleştiri şeklinde kendini gösteren bu eleştiri metotları gözden geçirildiğinde bu metotların çeşitli edebi sanatları yorumlamasında felsefenin ne kadar geniş bir etkisi olduğu görülecektir. Ancak ben, bu araştırmada, konunun uzamasından endişe ederek, modern edebi eleştirinin gelişmesinde en çok etkisi olan unsurları çıkarıp felsefi değişim ve bu değişimin gelişmesini tartışmayı ve modern eleştiri eğilimlerinin kaynağını teşkil eden bu felsefî temellerle çözümlemeye dayalı uygulamaları başka bir çalışmada ele almayı tercih ettim. ABSTRACT Philosophical Changes and its Effect on Methods of Modern Literary Criticism This study handles philosophical changes and developments that have led to the advancement of modern literary criticism. Practical methods of modern criticism are based on such changes and developments, which have given way to a more detailed reading and examination of literary devices. As for as such critical approaches as structuralism, stylistics, perception theory, text knowledge and cultural criticism are concerned, it will be realized that philosophy has a great effect on these methods’ interpretation of various literary devices on the interpretation of these styles of writing. However, I prefer in this study to discuss philosophical change and its development excluding the most effective factors in the development of modern literary criticism, and to examine the discussion of the development of this change and the methods based on philosophical analyses in modern literary critical tendencies in another study.

Keywords

Edebi Eleştiri, Felsefe, Yapısalcılık, Üslupçuluk, Edebi Eleştiri;Felsefe;Yapısalcılık;Üslupçuluk, Literary Criticism, Philosophy, Structuralism, Stylistics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 3
    download downloads 9
  • 3
    views
    9
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
3
9
Green