Downloads provided by UsageCounts
This entry contains the R data and codes used in the article "Comparing local calibration using random effects estimation and Bayesian calibrations. A case study with a mixed effect stem profile model". Stem profile models are complex models predicting the diameter of a tree at any position along the stem. These models are fitted on detailed datasets, which spatial representativity is poor. Local calibration brings strong improvements to their prediction capabilities. This study offers a good support for local calibration of allometric models for trees. The R code file 'R code for random effects estimation.R' contains the R code for estimating the random effect parameters for new data, in the example of the taper model used in the study (which has 3 random terms. The R data files contain the plot-level and tree-level measurements for each experimental site (Application Set site 1 and 2). The R code file 'Stan code ApSite 1.R' contains the STAN code for the Bayesian MCMC calibration of the taper model on trees sampled in the application site 1.
{"references": ["Bouriaud O, Stefan G, Saint-Andr\u00e9 L (2019) Comparing local calibration using random effects estimation and Bayesian calibrations. A case study with a mixed effect stem profile model. Annals of Forest Science."]}
Research co-funded by the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS – UEFISCDI, project PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0781, and the EU H2020 DIABOLO (grant agreement No 633464).
allometry, mixed-effect model, calibration, Bayesian statistics, localizing
allometry, mixed-effect model, calibration, Bayesian statistics, localizing
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 11 | |
| downloads | 9 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts