Views provided by UsageCounts
This is the dataset used for the research "The Good, the Bad and the Bait: Detecting and Characterizing Clickbait on YouTube", with DOI: 10.1109/SPW.2018.00018. The dataset consists of three files: 1. groundtruth.json: This is the groundtruth dataset. We have 3443 manually annotated videos (we manually annotated more after the acceptance of the paper), and 17,648 videos that were obtained from channels that post clickbait or not. You can distinguish the method of annotation by observing the field "comments" in "clickbaitClassification" (the ones that have the comment "channels" are the ones obtained from the channels). 2. videos.json: Contains the data for 206K videos that were obtained as described in the paper. 3. predictions.json: It contains the mapping between the video id and the probability of our classifier. In our paper, we treat a video as clickbait if the probability is larger than 0.5. The related software produced for this study may be found here.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 16 |

Views provided by UsageCounts