Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2019
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE SPECIALTY CHOICE IN MEDICAL INTERNS AT QASSIM UNIVERSITY

Authors: Mazyad Alenezi, Hessa Alharbi, Haifa Alenezi, Wjdan Alharbi, Boshra Alkhalaf2, Renad Alsuhaibani;

FACTORS AFFECTING FUTURE SPECIALTY CHOICE IN MEDICAL INTERNS AT QASSIM UNIVERSITY

Abstract

Introduction: There is significant shortage of Saudi physicians in several specialties. The process of choosing future specialty is poorly understood. This study aims to identify the factors that influence medical interns to choose their future specialty. Methodology: This study was designed as a cross-sectional survey. In September 2018, medical interns at Qassim University in Saudi Arabia were asked to fill out an on-line-questionnaire. On 24 items with 5-points Likert scale, the interns rated the importance of specified occupational and individual aspects. Moreover, interns were asked to specify their intended specialty. Analysis was performed using Statistical Package for Social Science SPSS version 24. Chi-squared test and logistic regression were used to test the association between deciding a future specialty and interns’ socio-demographic factors. Result: 75 interns participated in the survey. Majority of the interns chose good treatment outcome as their most influential factor for choosing their future career, while gender distribution in the specialty was the weakest factor. Pediatrics and general surgery were the most preferred specialties followed by internal medicine. The least preferred specialties were anesthesiology, community medicine, urology, ICU, cardiac and pediatric surgery. There were no gender differences found. Conclusion: Many factors appeared to inspire medical students and interns to choose a future specialty. Administrative efforts may also play a major role in steering medical students toward certain specialties to meet the workforce demand. Thus, we recommend to establish a formal career counseling to guide students choose their medical specialty and cultivate their interest. Key words: Medical interns; Future specialty; Cross-sectional ; Career counseling; Qassim.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 10
    download downloads 12
  • 10
    views
    12
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
10
12
Green
Related to Research communities