Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2016
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Body Mass Index; Can Be Affect The Success Rate Of Flexible Urs In The Kidney Stones Patients

Authors: Musab Ilgi*, Sinan Levent Kirecci, Sedat Cakmak, Cemil Kutsal; Urology Clinic, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal;

Body Mass Index; Can Be Affect The Success Rate Of Flexible Urs In The Kidney Stones Patients

Abstract

Objectives: Management of the kidney stones can be a challenge especially in obese patients, in this study we evaluated the results of flexible urs success rates in obese patients. Material And Methods: Retrospective regarding of the 107 kidney stones patients who performed flexible ureteroscopy in our clinics between December 2012 with February 2016. Patients were categorised according to WHO BMI classification. Fluoroscopy time, operative time, complications that occur during the procedure were recorded. Overall stone-free rates were evaluated after the four weeks later the operation by taking the KUB or Abdomen CT. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia using with the three different flexible ureteroscopy and Ho:Yag Laser. Except to two patient, we used access sheats in all patients. We analysed the dates with using IBM SPSS 21 software. Result: There were no statistically significant differences in the frequency of among these groups (p > 0.05); when to compare the operative, fluoroscopy and hospitalisation time and stone-free rates between of groups. The overall mean stone volume was 337.2 +/- 231. 5 mm3, mean operative time was 79.6 +/- 22.6 minutes, average fluoroscopy time was 12.8+/- 17.5 second and hospitalisation time is 34 +/-25.9 hour. Average operative time was measured (77.7 +/-20.7 min) in the obese two as the shortest one. The shortest average fluoroscopy time ( 8.18+/-8.83 sec ) was taken in obese two group. Same statistical insignificance was attained about the hospitalisation time; the overweight group had the shortest duration (31.68 +/- 25.2 hours ). Moreover, we analysed the stone free rates; respectively we got relatively high success rates in obese 1 ( %75.9 ), obese 2 ( %72.7) compare the others but it also was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Flexible Urs is a powerful treatment modality in the kidney stone patients, irrespective of the body mass index. Based on the body weight, make predictions about the operation, fluoroscopy and hospitalisation time and stone free rates shouldn't be recommended.

Keywords

Body Mass Index, Flexible URS, Obesity, Kidney Stones.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    OpenAIRE UsageCounts
    Usage byUsageCounts
    visibility views 4
    download downloads 5
  • 4
    views
    5
    downloads
    Powered byOpenAIRE UsageCounts
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
visibility
download
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
views
OpenAIRE UsageCountsViews provided by UsageCounts
downloads
OpenAIRE UsageCountsDownloads provided by UsageCounts
0
Average
Average
Average
4
5
Green