
AbstractThis paper proposes a Physical-Mechanistic Objective Bayesianism (PMOB), positing that probability distributions are grounded in the superposition of physical driving mechanisms constrained by global conservation laws. IntroductionThe interpretation of probability has long been divided among subjective, frequentist, and objective Bayesian accounts. The objective Bayesian tradition—exemplified by Jaynes (1957a, 1957b; 2003), Jeffreys (1946), and Popper (1959)—has made significant progress in grounding probability in constraints that transcend personal bias, whether informational, geometrical, or physical. This paper proposes Physical-Mechanistic Objective Bayesianism (PMOB) as a further development—and radicalization—of this lineage. PMOB asserts a strong reductionist and ontological claim: statistical distributions are not merely constrained by information or geometry, they are the direct projective mirror images of the physical mechanisms that drive observed phenomena. Every statistical regularity is, at bottom, the macroscopic residue of numerous underlying physical driving factors, whose synthesized effect is constrained by global conservation laws derived via Noether's theorem from spacetime symmetries. PMOB is therefore strongly reductionist (statistical phenomena are reducible in principle to physical mechanisms and their interactions) and ontological (probability distributions are features of the physical world, not constructs of human inference). It elevates objective Bayesianism from a theory of inference to a theory of physical intelligibility.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
