
This study compares the pragmatic purposes (maqsad) of joy-expressing emotive units in English and Uzbek. Drawing on the theory of emotivity (Shakhovsky, 2008), the functional semantics of evaluation (Wolf, 1985), speech-act theory (Austin, 1962; Searle, 1976), and the ethnosociopragmatic model of Safarov and Toirova (2007), it analyses joy-emotives in Doris Lessing's The Golden Notebook and Said Ahmad's Qirq besh kun. In both languages such units fuse two purposes: the illocutionary expression of the speaker's own positive state and the perlocutionary effort to affect the hearer and build rapport. The languages differ in their means: English encodes joy lexically, through manner adverbs, affect adjectives, verbs of enjoyment, and idioms in the reporting frame, whereas Uzbek encodes it morphologically and ritually, through the diminutive -gina, vocative endearments, and gratitude formulae. The contrast is interpreted as linguocultural.
emotive units, emotivity, joy, pragmatic purpose, illocutionary force, perlocutionary effect, English–Uzbek contrastive pragmatics
emotive units, emotivity, joy, pragmatic purpose, illocutionary force, perlocutionary effect, English–Uzbek contrastive pragmatics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
