Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Duellum Veritatis — Adversarial Science Digests

Authors: Dolgikh, Oleg;

Duellum Veritatis — Adversarial Science Digests

Abstract

Duellum Veritatis is a series of adversarial science digests. Each issue distills a structured duel between two reasoning agents over a contested scientific claim into a short, readable explainer with simulation-derived figures. This is the umbrella record for the series; individual issues are published on https://occam.world and cite this DOI. The inaugural issue, "Two Choirs in the Dark", examines whether two mechanisms of synchronization — a shared external noise versus weak mutual coupling — can be distinguished in principle from passive observation alone (Kuramoto model, two oscillator groups).

Umbrella record for the Duellum Veritatis series. Published by Occam Research.

Keywords

Kuramoto model, observational equivalence, adversarial reasoning, Duellum Veritatis, science communication, synchronization, coupled oscillators

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green