Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC PROPERTIES OF COMPARATIVE ADJECTIVE PHRASES IN UZBEK: A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS, SEMANTIC FIELDS, AND STYLISTIC FUNCTIONS

Authors: Rakhmonkulov Ma'rufjon Maxamat o'g'li;

LEXICAL-SEMANTIC PROPERTIES OF COMPARATIVE ADJECTIVE PHRASES IN UZBEK: A SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS OF MORPHOLOGICAL MECHANISMS, SEMANTIC FIELDS, AND STYLISTIC FUNCTIONS

Abstract

This paper investigates the lexical-semantic properties of comparative adjective phrases (CAPs) in contemporary Uzbek, analysing the morphological mechanisms through which comparativity is encoded, the semantic fields across which comparative adjectives are distributed, and the stylistic functions they perform in different registers of Uzbek discourse. As an agglutinative Turkic language, Uzbek encodes comparison through a system that is morphologically uniform but semantically and pragmatically rich: the suffix -roq and the ablative postposition -dan form the grammatical core of the comparative system, while a layered set of lexical intensifiers, equative particles, and register-sensitive construction types extends its expressive range. Through close analysis of 54 attested examples drawn from literary, scientific, journalistic, and spoken Uzbek, the study identifies five principal semantic fields of comparative adjectives, four categories of pragmatically and semantically complex usage, and three major register-conditioned variation patterns. The findings reveal that the Uzbek comparative system is typologically distinctive in several respects that bear directly on contrastive analysis with English and on the teaching and translation of comparative constructions.

Related Organizations
Keywords

comparative adjective phrases, Uzbek morphology, -roq suffix, lexical-semantic analysis, semantic fields, intensifiers, equative comparison, register variation, contrastive linguistics

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average