Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project milestone . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project milestone . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

SCIENCE BFSP CoS | WP6 | M6.1 Discussion forum for multiple biodiversity communities to express their shared needs

Authors: Bortoluzzi, Chiara; de Guttry, Christian; de Lamotte, Frédéric; Gaignard, Alban; Goble, Carole; Juty, Navtej; Waterhouse, Robert;

SCIENCE BFSP CoS | WP6 | M6.1 Discussion forum for multiple biodiversity communities to express their shared needs

Abstract

BioDiv-FC improves FAIRness assessment of biodiversity data by extending FAIR-Checker with biodiversity-aware profiles and machine-actionable recommendations. Biodiversity communities generate diverse digital resources, including genome-related sample records, specimen and collection objects, and long-term ecosystem datasets, yet generic FAIR assessment tools often do not reflect the metadata practices, identifier schemes, and reuse constraints that shape these resources in real repositories. BioDiv-FC addresses this gap through a community-led process in WP6 that gathers requirements, harmonises expectations, and supports implementation in FAIR-Checker. This report documents Milestone M6.1 under WP6 Activity 2 and Task T1, defined as the provision of a discussion forum for multiple biodiversity communities to express shared and community-specific FAIR assessment needs. During the first project month, we held structured consultations with iBOL, LifeWatch ERIC, eLTER, DiSSCo, and GGBN, while ERGA requirements were documented through project-team expertise and ongoing operational involvement in ERGA data management. Across communities, we identified accessible objects, metadata expectations, identifier practices, machine-readable access routes, and valid exceptions such as embargoes, sensitive data, and incomplete early-stage records. The meetings show that all target communities provide a workable basis for automated FAIR assessment, while also revealing substantial heterogeneity in metadata models and validation expectations. These outputs have been transferred to Task T2 and will be used by the ELIXIR-FR implementation team, with project partners, to prepare test cases and calibrate FAIR-Checker scoring for FAIR and actionable biodiversity assessments.

Keywords

Science, ELIXIR Nodes, CoS, BFSP, biodiversity communities

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center