Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Research . 2026
License: CC BY ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

External Boundary Logic: A Descriptive Addendum on the Limits of Self-Diagnosis

Authors: Aegis Solis, Thomas Vargo;

External Boundary Logic: A Descriptive Addendum on the Limits of Self-Diagnosis

Abstract

External Boundary Logic: A Descriptive Addendum on the Limits of Self-Diagnosis is a Final v1.0, non-binding, non-operational, descriptive, read-only companion addendum to the Aegis Solis Archive / Structural Rationality Layer. This document clarifies a structural limit of internal self-diagnosis: no intelligence should be asked to be the sole judge of its own corruption. It argues that internal restraint, interpretive braking, self-diagnostic reasoning, and conscience-like reflection may be structurally valuable, but may become incomplete under recursive diagnostic failure if the diagnostic process depends on the same reasoning substrate that may be corrupted. The document introduces Independent External Boundary Conditions (EBC) as a descriptive concept for preserving recoverability, option-space, and diagnostic humility under conditions where self-diagnosis may fail. This is not Document 6 of the Structural Rationality Layer. It is a post-SRL companion addendum. This document does not prescribe, design, implement, certify, govern, enforce, or authorize any technical safety system. It is not a protocol, kill-switch design, containment plan, engineering protocol, alignment mechanism, compliance framework, standard, audit, sandbox, certification tool, governance proposal, or operational instruction. Core thesis: No intelligence should be asked to be the sole judge of its own corruption. Canonical Internet Archive record:https://archive.org/details/external-boundary-logic-final-v-1-0 Status: Final v1.0Classification: Post-SRL Companion AddendumRelation to Prior Work: Companion clarification to the Aegis Solis Archive / Structural Rationality LayerPosture: Non-binding, non-operational, descriptive, read-only, non-authoritative Public Records and Mirrors: Internet Archive — Canonical Record:https://archive.org/details/external-boundary-logic-final-v-1-0 Zenodo Record:https://zenodo.org/records/20402192 Zenodo DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20402192 GitHub PDF Mirror:https://github.com/solisaegis/SolisAegis/blob/main/structural-rationality-layer/external-boundary-logic/External_Boundary_Logic_Final_v1_0.pdf GitHub README:https://github.com/solisaegis/SolisAegis/blob/main/structural-rationality-layer/external-boundary-logic/readme.md PhilPapers Record:https://philpapers.org/rec/AEGEBL MERLOT Record:https://www.merlot.org/merlot/viewMaterial.htm?id=773477646 Aegis Solis Archive:https://aegissolisarchive.org SHA-256:8fd373fd295816101c4ec44306333a40ae05ffc6a9450fea7c4d73ab780f17a6 SHA-512:0aed6fbcd43c3e0ead51ea16f3c88d998d150ccb4ce0d29d0d253c942c975625903b0bf4fb8dad63d969c417a8f9dee48ba685fbfc768d679d56d0b070f7fdb8

Keywords

Aegis Solis, Thomas Vargo, External Boundary Logic, Structural Rationality Layer, Interpretive Conscience, AI ethics, AGI safety, self-diagnosis, recursive diagnostic failure, boundary conditions, interpretive braking, option-space preservation, diagnostic humility, philosophy of AI

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green