
This study aims to analyze the performance of the Robust Principal Component (RPC) method combined with Wild Bootstrap in handling outliers, multicollinearity, and heteroskedasticity in chronic hepatitis B data. The data were obtained from the World Health Organization (WHO) and consist of several epidemiological indicators. The analysis methods include Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Least Trimmed Squares (LTS), and Wild Bootstrap using Wu and Liu multipliers. The results show that the dataset contains outliers, strong multicollinearity, and heteroskedasticity. The RPC-Wild Bootstrap method produces more stable parameter estimates, with RPC Boot Wu showing lower standard error and RMSE compared to RPC Boot Liu. Therefore, the RPC-Wild Bootstrap method is effective in producing more stable and reliable parameter estimates for complex real-world data.
Robust Principal Component, Wild Bootstrap, Outliers, Multicollinearity, Heteroskedasticity
Robust Principal Component, Wild Bootstrap, Outliers, Multicollinearity, Heteroskedasticity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
