
CORRECTION NOTICE (v6 — May 2026) Final result: r = 0.017, p-val = 0.95 — NULL RESULT. Earlier reported values (r ≥ 0.94, r = 0.51–0.68) resulted from normalization selection bias and are NOT reproducible under correct methodology. Correct analysis: A(p) vs ψ₀(p) via Chebyshev explicit formula → no significant relationship. Bootstrap (1,000 iter): - zeros_ht (10K): mean r = 0.09 UNSTABLE - zeros1 (100K): mean r = 0.36 UNSTABLE - zeros6 (2M): mean r = 0.68 MODERATE Withdrawal requested from Experimental Mathematics (Submission ID: 268686910). Correction history: https://research.nexcore.ltd/paper1/changelog.html Repository: https://github.com/myagmardorj-cloud/Myagmardorj Version: v0.4 (May 2026)
Riemann zeros, number theory, Bogomolny-Keating, prime numbers, random matrix theory, Riemann zeros, number theory, Bogomolny-Keating, prime numbers, random matrix theory
Riemann zeros, number theory, Bogomolny-Keating, prime numbers, random matrix theory, Riemann zeros, number theory, Bogomolny-Keating, prime numbers, random matrix theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
