Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Fictive Narrativism and Multiperspectival Voice in Virginia Woolf's A Haunted House: A Narratological Mapping of Speaker Ambiguity and Ghostly Focalization

Fictive Narrativism and Multiperspectival Voice in Virginia Woolf's A Haunted House
Authors: Garces-Pitchuela, Noeme;

Fictive Narrativism and Multiperspectival Voice in Virginia Woolf's A Haunted House: A Narratological Mapping of Speaker Ambiguity and Ghostly Focalization

Abstract

Virginia Woolf's short story "A Haunted House" (1921) is interpreted as a lyrical ghost story contemplating love, memory, and the endurance of the past; however, its arrangement of narrative voice and perspective has not been thoroughly analyzed within systematic narratological frameworks. This study examines narrative techniques of fictive narrativism through multiperspectival voice and ghostly focalization to blur distinctions between life and death, as well as between fact and fiction. By combining Genette's structural narratology with cognitive and unnatural narratology, the study uses a qualitative, text-based design that includes coding of narrative segments for voice type, focalizer, focalization, and ontological status. The analysis delineates four speaking positions: the living first-person narrator, the living couple's "we," the ghostly couple, and a blended or ambiguous "we." The intersection of these positions generates speaker ambiguity at thematic junctures. Internal focalization shifts between living, ghostly, and blended perceivers, with unclear parts coming together around the themes of "treasure," "safe," and shared emotional discovery. The alternation of natural and unnatural perspectives, facilitated by ambiguous segments, creates a “haunted” narrative texture in which readers navigate the boundary between realistic and spectral frames without achieving stabilization of their position. The research concludes that A Haunted House embodies haunting as a structural phenomenon in terms of voice and focalization, illustrating the efficacy of integrating structural, cognitive, and unnatural narratology for examining modernist fiction and supernatural literature, particularly in relation to ontological boundaries and interpretive instability.

Related Organizations
Keywords

multiperspectival voice, unnatural narratology, ghostly focalization, ontological boundaries, a haunted house, virginia woolf, speaker ambiguity, fictive narrativism, modernist fiction, narratology

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green