
SummaryTesting homogeneity of dispersions may be of its own scientific interest as well as an important auxiliary step verifying assumptions of a main analysis. The problem is that many biological and ecological data are highly skewed and zero‐inflated. Also the number of variables often exceeds the sample size. Thus data analysts often do not rely on parametric assumptions, but use a particular dissimilarity measure to calculate a matrix of pairwise differences. This matrix is then the basis for further statistical inference. Anderson (2006) proposed a distance‐based test of homogeneity of multivariate dispersions for a one‐way ANOVA design, for which a matrix of pairwise dissimilarities can be taken as an input. The key idea, like in Levene's test, is to replace each observation with its distance to an estimated group center. In this paper we suggest an alternative approach that is based on the means of within‐group distances and does not require group centre calculations to obtain the test statistic. We show that this approach can have theoretical as well as practical advantages. A permutation procedure that gives type I error close to the prescribed value even in small samples is described.
Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA), bats, bat, permutation tests, Chiroptera, Levene's test, Animals, Animalia, Computer Simulation, Chordata, Nonparametric hypothesis testing, Ecosystem, Analysis of Variance, ANOVA, spatial median, Biodiversity, Anthozoa, principal coordinates, multivariate analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Mammalia, U-statistics, Sparrows
Analysis of variance and covariance (ANOVA), bats, bat, permutation tests, Chiroptera, Levene's test, Animals, Animalia, Computer Simulation, Chordata, Nonparametric hypothesis testing, Ecosystem, Analysis of Variance, ANOVA, spatial median, Biodiversity, Anthozoa, principal coordinates, multivariate analysis, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Mammalia, U-statistics, Sparrows
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
