
This poster presents a transferable computational framework for studying canonisation processes through extracting and analysing canonical references in academic texts. Using a 16-discipline English corpus from JSTOR, we propose a three-phase methodology: code (developing Named-Entity Recognition methods for canonical reference extraction), context (visualising citation patterns), and canon (understanding formation processes). Our approach examines transferability at each stage: the code phase explores large language models over traditional keyword search methods, emphasising advantages of general over domain-specific models; the context phase demonstrates high transferability through established network analysis techniques; the canon phase reveals how the concept of canon itself transfers across disciplines. This iterative workflow contributes reusable and transferable Digital Humanities frameworks for studying cultural authority and textual transmission, with the objective of advancing understanding of canonisation dynamics across disciplinary contexts.
Paper, Content Analysis, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, ddc:000, canonisation, transferability, Text, Visualisation, Named-Entity Recognition (NER), Forschungsprozess, canon studies, Named Entity Recognition, Large Language Models, Digital Humanities, scientometrics, DHd2026, citation analysis, Programming, Poster, digital humanities, Data-Recognition
Paper, Content Analysis, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/000, ddc:000, canonisation, transferability, Text, Visualisation, Named-Entity Recognition (NER), Forschungsprozess, canon studies, Named Entity Recognition, Large Language Models, Digital Humanities, scientometrics, DHd2026, citation analysis, Programming, Poster, digital humanities, Data-Recognition
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
