
In April 2022, we conducted a voting experiment during the French presidential election. This experiment was conducted on a representative sample of the French population recruited through the online polling platform Dynata. In this experiment, participants were asked to test alternative voting methods to elect the French president, more precisely approval voting, evaluative voting and the majority judgement. A total of 1\,972 participants took part in this experiment. This paper provides a description of the dataset. This experiment was made possible thanks to the support of the project ANR CITIZENS (ANR-22-CE26-0019-01, Implication des citoyens dans la décision publique locale), the research call from University Jean Monnet 2022 operated by GATE Lyon Saint-Etienne, fundings from LAMSADE University Paris Dauphine, and from CREM University of Caen.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
