Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Article . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Perceived Stress and Verbal Fluency in Normal Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Study from Eastern India

Authors: Priyam Bhunia;

Perceived Stress and Verbal Fluency in Normal Adult Population: A Cross-Sectional Study from Eastern India

Abstract

Background: Perceived stress has been implicated in executive functioning tasks such as verbal fluency. However, evidence from Indian populations examining the relationship between perceived stress and verbal fluency remains limited. Aim: To assess perceived stress levels in a normal adult population and examine their association with verbal fluency performance as measured by the Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT). Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 136 healthy adults from a tertiary care setting. Perceived stress was assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), while verbal fluency was evaluated using the Controlled Word Association Test (COWAT), including total score and mistake score. Sociodemographic variables were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, employing independent-samples t-tests, exploratory analysis of variance, and Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results: The mean PSS score of the sample was 21.28 ± 5.98. Female participants demonstrated significantly higher perceived stress (p = 0.008). Significant differences in PSS scores were also observed across religious groups (p = 0.003). No significant differences in perceived stress were found with respect to other demographic variables. Correlation analysis revealed no significant association between PSS scores and COWAT total scores (r = 0.013, p = 0.882) or COWAT mistake scores (r = 0.048, p = 0.579). Conclusion: Perceived stress varies across certain sociodemographic variables such as sex and religion but shows no significant relationship with verbal fluency performance in a normal adult population. These findings suggest that everyday perceived stress may not directly impair phonemic verbal fluency among healthy individuals.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average