
Unified access to anonymous records through a trustworthy system is needed in our increasingly globalised world that still suffers from profoundly disconnected health care services. Emergencies are followed by redundant, costly and slow medical examinations without a global health data sharing mechanism. We establish the foundations of a decentralised healthcare ledger where patients decide what to share, with who, and with minimal costs. We review the state-of-the-art of transparent, auditable and interactive Blockchain-based healthcare studies, developing ClinicAppChain. Our solution features authentication, confidentiality and permissioned data sharing, considering the EU data protection regulation of 2018. ClinicAppChain is a cross-platform low-cost Blockchain prototype that empowers patients, hospitals, researchers, pharmaceuticals and insurance industries without crypto-currencies involved, and with a negligible energy foot-print (7.7 watts per node).
Work by Munoz and Fuentes is supported by the projects MAGIC P12-TIC1814 and HADAS TIN2015-64841-R (co-financed by FEDER funds). Work by Constantinescu and Asenjo is supported by the project TIN2016-80920-R, funded by the Spanish Government. ClinicAppChain has been supported by IMFAHE Foundation-Nodal Award of 2018. We are particularly grateful to other members of the awarded team that have guided us in the sanitary side and legal aspects: Esther Herrera, Laura Timanfaya, Patricia Rodríguez and Myriam Martínez.
blockchain, hyperledger, low-power, low-cost, Ingeniería del software, Asistencia sanitaria, healthcare, Aplicaciones informáticas, Blockchains
blockchain, hyperledger, low-power, low-cost, Ingeniería del software, Asistencia sanitaria, healthcare, Aplicaciones informáticas, Blockchains
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
