Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2026
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Emergent Schwarzschild Geometry from Lattice Field Medium Dynamics

Authors: Partin, Greg;

Emergent Schwarzschild Geometry from Lattice Field Medium Dynamics

Abstract

We demonstrate that the Schwarzschild metric emerges from Lattice Field Medium (LFM) substrate dynamics because measurement apparatus, clocks and rulers, are themselves χ-dependent wave excitations. A critical distinction exists between GOV-04 (quasi-static) and GOV-02 (wave equation): GOV-04 gives χ = χ₀ − Λ/r producing retrograde precession, but GOV-02 wave dynamics at equilibrium produce χ(r) = χ₀√(1 − rₛ/r) where rₛ = 2GM/c². Clock frequencies scale as ω ∝ χ, giving time dilation gₜₜ = −(1 − rₛ/r). Ruler sizes scale as λ ∝ 1/χ, giving spatial curvature gᵢⱼ = (1 + rₛ/r)δᵢⱼ. The combined metric is the Schwarzschild solution in isotropic coordinates—geometrically identical to standard Schwarzschild. This resolves a critical objection that LFM, as a scalar field theory, cannot reproduce General Relativity's predictions. Unlike Nordström's scalar gravity (1913), which modifies only g₀₀ and predicts 1/3 of Mercury's perihelion precession, LFM produces full tensor-like phenomenology because both temporal and spatial measurements are substrate-dependent. Key results: Mercury perihelion precession: 43.06 arcsec/century (0.14% from GR's 42.98) Gravitational light bending: 1.75 arcsec at solar limb (matches GR exactly) GOV-02 equilibrium χ-profile matches √(1-rₛ/r) with RMS residual 0.0118 (vs 0.0130 for linear fit) The key insight: LFM is not a scalar field propagating through spacetime, it IS the computational substrate from which spacetime geometry emerges. This categorical distinction is what allows a scalar substrate to produce tensor-like phenomenology.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!