Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Part of book or chapter of book . 2026
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The Experience FactorA Pilot Demographic Profile of HEI Faculty ($N=283$) and its Implications for Digital Training

Authors: Oliva Teles, Rui; Santos, Miguel; Hernando García-Cervigón, Alberto; Martínez de Carnero Calzada, Fernando;

The Experience FactorA Pilot Demographic Profile of HEI Faculty ($N=283$) and its Implications for Digital Training

Abstract

Digital transformation in higher education is often framed as a technological challenge, yet faculty demographics represent a critical and underexamined variable. This study provides a pilot demographic profile of faculty involved in the SOULSS project and examines its implications for digital training strategies. Using a quantitative descriptive design, Phase 1 analyzes age distribution data from a multi-country faculty survey (N = 283). Phase 2 adds an exploratory validation probe conducted in 2025 (N = 18) to examine the relationship between age and years of teaching experience. Results reveal a strongly skewed profile: 67.9% of respondents are over 45 years old, with the largest segment in the 55+ group, and the majority reporting more than 16 years of teaching experience. These findings indicate that most faculty are pedagogical experts rather than novice instructors, but may be digital “late adopters.” Drawing on andragogy and the digital native–immigrant debate, the paper argues that generic digital literacy training is misaligned with this demographic reality. Instead, differentiated, experience-sensitive training models are required to support effective and sustainable digital adoption.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average