
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly being used as part of complex agentic systems that orchestrate the use of external tools, such as retrieval mechanisms or code interpreters. In this survey, we argue that this development necessitates a rethinking of the goals of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Rather than focusing on providing users with explanations for monolithic machine learning models, we need system-level explanations that also provide information about which and how tools are used, as well as how external execution traces causally influence system behavior. We provide an overview of the existing methods in explainable AI and discuss the limitations of monolithic XAI methods in agentic contexts. Finally, we highlight open challenges in providing faithful explanations for LLM-based systems.
tool-augmented LMs, XAI, large language models, AI agents, explainable AI
tool-augmented LMs, XAI, large language models, AI agents, explainable AI
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
