
Abstract Generative AI tools like Google Gemini have created new opportunities for language learning. However, empirical evidence regarding their impact on oral proficiency remains limited. This quasi-experimental study investigates the effectiveness of Google Gemini as a scaffolding tool for Vietnamese university freshmen (N=78). Over a seven-week intervention, the experimental group utilized Gemini for ideation, real-time feedback, and conversation simulation, while the control group followed traditional instruction. Data was collected via pre- and post-tests based on the CEFR B1 rubric, alongside anxiety surveys and semi-structured interviews. Paired sample t-tests revealed that the AI-assisted group demonstrated statistically significant improvements in Fluency and Discourse Management (p < .05) and a substantial reduction in speaking anxiety compared to the control group. However, no significant differences were observed in Grammatical Accuracy or Lexical Resource, suggesting that while AI effectively lowers the affective filter and promotes communicative flow, it may require longer-term integration to enhance linguistic precision. These findings challenge the view of AI as a mere correction tool, proposing instead its role as a psychological scaffold that empowers reticent learners to speak more confidently.
Speaking Anxiety, Generative AI, EFL Fluency, Affective Filter, Google Gemini, Scaffolding
Speaking Anxiety, Generative AI, EFL Fluency, Affective Filter, Google Gemini, Scaffolding
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
