Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

BatCAT deliverable 3.1: Report on uncertainty quantification methodology

Authors: Stephan, Simon; Zhang, Xueqi; Lengiewicz, Jakub; Belouettar, Salim; Horsch, Martin Thomas;

BatCAT deliverable 3.1: Report on uncertainty quantification methodology

Abstract

This deliverable presents a comprehensive methodology for the identification and quantification of uncertainties in modeling and simulation of battery manufacturing processes. The concept is generic and can be applied to practically any simulation technique. The objective is to improve the reliability, reproducibility, and transparency of modeling and simulation of battery manufacturing processes. It was tested and validated using two specific simulation techniques, namely molecular simulation using classical force fields and equations of state (EOS). The report covers a description of the developed uncertainty quantification methodology – first giving an overview; then, giving details and demonstrating the application to exemplary modeling techniques. The two examples differ significantly demonstrating the robustness of the uncertainty quantification methodology. The increasing complexity of digital manufacturing processes, combined with the integration of models, simulations, and experimental data, necessitates a rigorous approach to uncertainty quantification (UQ) and reliability assessment. Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) is a cornerstone of the BatCAT project's strategy to develop reliable, transparent, and actionable digital twins for battery cell manufacturing. D3.1 addresses this challenge by developing a formal methodology for the representation, propagation, and management of uncertainty across the manufacturing data space and supporting provenance tracking. Accordingly, the objectives of deliverable D3.1 are to: Develop a formal model and methodology for representing uncertainty and reliability. Establish mechanisms for uncertainty propagation. Support evidence aggregation from heterogeneous sources. Enable documentation of uncertainties in models, simulations, and experimental data.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green
Funded by
Related to Research communities