
Context and Academic FrameworkThis research study is an original scholarly work conducted within an independent academic framework and prepared in accordance with established research and publication standards. The study is presented for academic dissemination and contributes to ongoing scholarly dialogue within its relevant disciplinary field. The research reflects independent academic inquiry and is prepared for permanent academic archiving and citation. Upon publication, it forms part of the Catholic Open University Research & Study Center Digital Library, where it is preserved for scholarly reference, academic indexing, and long-term accessibility. Abstract This study examines the continued relevance of Pierre Bourdieu’s theory of social inequality in the context of 21st-century transformations such as digitalization, globalization, and precarization. It begins with a reconstruction of Bourdieu’s central concepts—capital, habitus, and fields—and evaluates their applicability to contemporary forms of inequality. Particular attention is given to digital divides, transnational capital flows, and the instability of precarious labor markets. The findings suggest that while Bourdieu’s model remains a powerful tool for explaining the reproduction of inequality, it reaches its limits in addressing emerging digital forms of capital, fluid habitual structures, and hybrid global economies. Comparative perspectives with theories such as Beck’s Risk Society, Castells’ Network Society, and Fraser’s analyses of digital capitalism reveal both the enduring strengths and the shortcomings of Bourdieu’s framework. The study concludes that Bourdieu’s approach must be expanded with new concepts—such as digital capital and transnational fields—to fully capture present realities.
Bourdieu, Digitalization, Globalization
Bourdieu, Digitalization, Globalization
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
