
This three-session training supports members of academic assessment committees in translating the principles of responsible academic assessment into everyday practice. Drawing on research, policy developments, and real assessment contexts, the training strengthens both individual and collective competence in fair, transparent, and future-oriented evaluation. Session 1 focuses on broadening perspectives in assessment, exploring how values such as quality over quantity, diverse career paths, and responsible research practices can be meaningfully recognized. Session 2 addresses interpersonal dynamics, equipping participants to navigate group processes, power relations, bias, and emotionally complex situations in assessment settings. Session 3 centers on designing effective BAC processes, connecting principles to concrete procedures, roles, and decision-making structures that support consistency, clarity, and trust. Together, the training fosters shared understanding, reflective practice, and practical tools to strengthen academic assessment cultures.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
