
This article examines the death of French streamer “Jean Pormanove”, who died live on the platform Kick after 12 days of on-camera abuse, watched by thousands and monetised in real time. It reconstructs the chain of accountability that made this tragedy possible and analyses the failures of multiple actors with the power to intervene: the platform, the media regulator, judicial and police authorities, and political leaders. Their combined inaction enabled the sustained exploitation, until death, of a vulnerable individual on a major live streaming platform. Through a socio-legal analysis, the article shows how this case exposes the limits of the EU’s digital governance model, whose effectiveness depends less on legislative sophistication than on the willingness and capacity of institutions to enforce it. Using “shock” as a central analytical lens, the paper explores its dual role as a driver of online visibility and an emerging regulatory concern. It concludes that without meaningful enforcement, the promise of a safer digital environment will remain largely illusory.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
