Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

A Ground-Truth Dataset for Article Separation in Historical Newspapers: A ProQuest corpus centered on the China Institute in America (1926-1952)

Authors: Armand, Cécile;

A Ground-Truth Dataset for Article Separation in Historical Newspapers: A ProQuest corpus centered on the China Institute in America (1926-1952)

Abstract

Overview This ground-truth dataset contains manually segmented documents, with partial post-OCR correction, derived from an original corpus of news articles focused on the China Institute in America, drawn from the ProQuest collection of Chinese Historical newspapers. The dataset includes 96 articles published between 1926 and 1952. The ground-truth data contains the following fields: DocId: Unique identifier as stored in the Modern China Textual Database (MCTB). Date: Original date of publication Title: Article title as provided by ProQuest. Source: Periodical in which the article was published (principally China Press, China Weekly Review, North-China Herald) Text: Original, unsegmented text text_seg: Historian-curated segmented text, produced using GPT + close reading length: Character/word length of the original text length_seg: Character/word length after re-segmentation diff: length difference between original and segmented text The segmentation process uses a hybrid human–AI workflow: an automated step with a GPT-based “Historical Text Segmenter,” followed by detailed historian-guided verification and correction. The result is a high-quality ground-truth dataset suitable for OCR benchmarking, segmentation modeling, historical text analysis, and digital humanities research. Additional documentation on the configuration of the GPT “Historical Text Segmenter” is available here. Use Cases This dataset is intended for: Historical research on Sino-American cultural institutions Media and discourse analysis of Shenbao Training/evaluating segmentation and OCR models Digital humanities projects requiring high-quality ground truth corpora Studies of textual reuse and viral news circulation in Republican-era newspapers

Keywords

historical newspapers, natural language processing, article segmentation

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Funded by
Related to Research communities