
Developing oral speech in second language learners is a dynamic process shaped by cognitive, linguistic, and psychological factors. Psycholinguistics provides crucial insights into how language is perceived, processed, and produced, while methodological innovations in language teaching offer practical strategies for enhancing learners’ speaking proficiency. This study explores the intersection of psycholinguistic principles and effective pedagogical approaches for oral speech development. Based on classroom observations, surveys, and instructional interventions involving sixty intermediate English learners, the research compares traditional communicative instruction with psycholinguistically informed methods such as shadowing, repetition, cognitive load management, and immediate corrective feedback. Findings demonstrate that cognitively optimized tasks significantly enhance fluency, accuracy, lexical retrieval, and learner confidence, suggesting that integrating psycholinguistic theory with contemporary methodology produces more effective learning outcomes. This article proposes a comprehensive framework for developing oral speech grounded in both scientific understanding and instructional best practices.
psycholinguistics; oral speech development; speaking proficiency; cognitive load; corrective feedback; language teaching methodology; task-based learning.
psycholinguistics; oral speech development; speaking proficiency; cognitive load; corrective feedback; language teaching methodology; task-based learning.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
