Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.17822
{"references": ["Archambault, \u00c9.; Amyot, D.; Deschamps, P.; Nicol, A.; Provencher, F.; Rebout, L. & Roberge, G. (2014): Proportion of Open Access Papers Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals at the European and World Levels\u20141996\u20132013. RTD-B6-PP-2011-2: Study to develop a set of indicators to measure open access. European Commission, http://science-metrix.com/files/science-metrix/publications/d_1.8_sm_ec_dg-rtd_proportion_oa_1996-2013_v11p.pdf, zuletzt besucht am 25.03.2015."]}
ROARMAP (http://roarmap.eprints.org) has been queried for policies of research institutions which require Open Access depositing of a version of all publications authored by their researchers. This data was needed to explain some of the outcomes of a study about the proportions of Open Access publishing in the European Research Area (ERA) as well as in Brazil, Canada, Japan and the USA (Archambault et al. 2014).
The data has been used for the article: Schmidt, Nora (2015): Goldener, Grüner und "Anderer" Weg zu Open Access: Statistiken für Österreich, in: Mitteilungen der VÖB 68 (2).
Open Access Policies
Open Access Policies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 4 |

Views provided by UsageCounts