Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Book . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

معايير تصنيف النصوص العربية للناطقين بغيرها وفقا للإطار الأوربي الدليل المرجعي

Determining the Classification Standards of Arabic Texts for Non-Native Arabic Speakers According to CEFR: Reference Guide
Authors: Ramadan, Hany; abdusselam, mustafa serkan; ABDALI, YAMINA;

معايير تصنيف النصوص العربية للناطقين بغيرها وفقا للإطار الأوربي الدليل المرجعي

Abstract

The work entitled “Determining the Classification Standards of Arabic Texts for Non-Native Arabic Speakers According to CEFR: Reference Guide (AMS Tool)” presents a rigorously developed scientific and practical framework for the classification of written Arabic texts in accordance with learners’ proficiency levels. The project establishes a comprehensive set of standards that align with the CEFR while being carefully adapted to the structural and linguistic specificities of the Arabic language. To ensure methodological precision and scholarly reliability, the project employed the Delphi Technique, engaging 59 experts from 14 countries in a structured, multi-stage consultation process. The resulting AMS Matrix extends beyond the six conventional CEFR levels (A1–C2) by introducing additional intermediate sub-levels (A1+, A2+, B1+, B2+, C1+). These refinements reflect the inherently gradual nature of Arabic language acquisition and address the wide proficiency gaps observed between the original CEFR bands. The model underwent empirical validation through pilot applications to established Arabic instructional series—most notably Al-‘Arabiyya Bayna Yadayk and Al-Lisan—demonstrating its coherence, robustness, and applicability across diverse instructional contexts. The project further produced two dedicated digital platforms: one for comprehensive documentation and another for the interactive implementation of the AMS tool, thereby facilitating its adoption by educational institutions, publishers, and researchers. In essence, the AMS Standards offer a unified, evidence-based benchmark that enhances the selection of Arabic texts, informs curriculum development, and contributes to more effective and motivating Arabic-language learning experiences for non-native speakers.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Arabic classification, arabic, MSA, cefr, AMS, Arabic text, Reference Guide

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green