
This paper presents the baseline results of the survey conducted by the LightCode1 Project Consortium, with the objective of exploring the potential of low-code application development in the field of higher education. The survey included Faculty Members, Higher Education Students and Labour Market Representatives of five European Countries (Austria,Croatia, France, Greece, and Serbia), targeting to address the growing demand for more efficient and accessible digital solutions within education institutions. The survey sought to gauge familiarity with low-code development, and potential challenges and perceived benefits of integrating low-code solutions into the educational domain. As one of the main features of the low-code approach, as well as of the LightCode project, is to provide tools and methodologies that facilitatethe development anddeployment of applications focused on supporting informed decision-making within organizations, the results presented here aligns with the main topic of the conference as the project will also contribute to enhance thestudent’s employability, which in turns also contributes to empowering societal transitions.
Low-Code, LightCode, Higher Education, Employability, Digital skills
Low-Code, LightCode, Higher Education, Employability, Digital skills
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
