Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Other literature type . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

AI for Translation and Interpreting. A Roadmap for Users and Policy Makers

Authors: Conseil Européen pour les Langues / European Language Council; Peeters, Kris; Daems, Joke; Peeters, Kris; Plieseis, Claudia; Sahin, Mehmet; Rival Ginel, Isabel;

AI for Translation and Interpreting. A Roadmap for Users and Policy Makers

Abstract

With this reflection paper, the authors discuss the use and impact of LLMs in multi- and interlingual communication and mediation. Their main goal is to raise awareness with users, both laypersons and professionals, as well as policymakers, concerning: how LLMs ‘communicate’, how this differs from human communication and what these differences imply when GenAI is used for T&I purposes (Section 1); what impact AI is having and is likely to have in the future, in T&I professions, in terms of communication quality, workflows, job content and job contentment (Section 2.); what uninvited side-effects should be considered and duly weighed against the possibilities offered by AI (Section 3.); and whether and how AI should be included in T&I education and training, i.e. the formal education of future T&I professionals, as well as in-service training for current T&I pro­fessio­nals (Section 4.).

Keywords

European Language Council; AI in Translation and Interpreting; large-scale survey; multilingualism; language policy; AI ethics; education and training

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!