
The article presents the etymological, semantic and culturological study of the most frequently employed English and Russian phraseological and paremiological units with a phytonymic component, identifying the most common phytonyms, either typical of both of these languages or characteristic of only one of them, in this way specifying similar as well as distinctive cultural connotations of the analyzed units. Several classification criteria, supported by the corresponding phraseological examples from the English and Russian languages, are applied in the article, thus highlighting the complexity and the uniqueness of the nations’ linguistic perception of the surrounding world.
Ceh, Oxana. Phraseological Units with a Phytonymic Component in the English and Russian Languages / Oxana Ceh // Probleme de filologie: aspecte teoretice şi practice : Materialele Conferinţei Ştiinţifice internaţionale, ediţia a 11-a, 28 noiembrie 2024. – Bălţi : [S. n.], 2025. – P. 105-110. – ISBN 978-9975-50-362-4.
linguistic comparison, phytonyms, paremias, phraseological units, phytonymic components
linguistic comparison, phytonyms, paremias, phraseological units, phytonymic components
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
