
Created in November 2024, the GIS Working Group (GIS-WG) was charged by the TEI Technical Council with proposing modifications to the TEI schema to support more detailed, granular, and standards-based methods of encoding geospatial data in TEI, along with corresponding updates to the Guidelines prose. The full charge is available at https://tei-c.org/activities/workgroups/gis-charge/. This presentation will share the current state of the GIS-WG's work, outlining the group's objectives, current recommendations, and the rationale behind them. Early in 2025, we devised a survey on current practices and preferences, which was completed by a number of community members particularly interested in this topic. We have also received feedback and discussion from the community during the March TEI Community Call. Drawing on community feedback and informed by existing practices, the GIS-WG has now developed a proposal for schema modifications allowing support for GeoJSON, WKT, GML, KML, and other standards within TEI encoding. We have sought to ensure that these proposed changes are sufficiently flexible to support widely-used standards, appropriately constrained to facilitate robust interchange, and backwards compatible with existing practices. We propose expanding to allow content in any of the supported geographic standards and creating a new element, , to allow for centralized definitions of geographic schemes. These two elements will both be members of a new class of attributes, which will specify the encoding scheme used, its version, and, to promote interchange, the level at which the geographic scheme is being implemented.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
