Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Sustainable Protein Extraction from Sugar Beet Leaves: A Comparative Study of Combined Techniques and Structural Properties

Authors: AKYÜZ, Ayça; Tekin, İdil; Aksoy, Zülal; Ersus, Seda;

Sustainable Protein Extraction from Sugar Beet Leaves: A Comparative Study of Combined Techniques and Structural Properties

Abstract

Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is one of the most widely cultivated industrial crops worldwide, generating significant amounts of leaf biomass as a by-product. Rich in protein, these leaves offer potential for sustainable protein recovery. This study investigated protein extraction from sugar beet leaves using various combined techniques and evaluated the properties of the resulting protein concentrates. Among the methods, ultrasound-assisted extraction (U-AIP) yielded the highest protein content (61.75%), indicating its effectiveness in enhancing recovery. The ultrasound–enzyme-assisted method (UE-AIP) resulted in the highest bulk density, while U-AIP had the lowest, reflecting variations in porosity and compactness. Color analysis revealed intense coloration in enzyme-assisted samples (E-AIP), while UE-AIP appeared darkest, demonstrating how extraction techniques influence pigment retention. FTIR analysis confirmed characteristic protein peaks and indicated the presence of cellulose and its derivatives, particularly in enzyme- and ultrasound-assisted extracts, suggesting interactions between protein and non-protein compounds. SEM analysis showed that combined methods led to more porous and fragmented microstructures than alkali extraction/isoelectric precipitation. Overall, ultrasound-assisted extraction significantly enhanced protein yield and modified structural characteristics such as bulk density and porosity. Spectroscopic and microscopic findings supported the presence of compositional interactions, affecting the functionality and structure of the resulting protein isolates.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average