
This study introduces the concept of the pseudospectrum as a powerful and intuitive tool for interpreting the complex logic of autoencoders. Often treated as "black boxes," these unsupervised models are capable of autonomously clustering data, yet their internal decision-making process remains largely hidden. By using a Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy (SERS) dataset of metabolites as a test case, we demonstrate that the pseudospectrum—defined as the reconstructed linear centroid from the latent space—serves as a tangible window into what the autoencoder has learned. Unlike a simple statistical average, the pseudospectrum is the model's unique, noise-free interpretation of the most relevant spectral features. We show how different autoencoder architectures—such as the sequential Convolutional 1D Autoencoder (Conv-1D AE) and the holistic Transformer Autoencoder (Transformer AE)—produce distinct pseudospectra that reflect their underlying philosophies. The Conv-1D AE generates a smooth, continuous curve that preserves local spectral patterns, while the Transformer AE, with its attention mechanism, creates a sparse, "spiky" representation that filters out irrelevant information and focuses only on key peaks. By anchoring the abstract concept of a latent space centroid to a well-understood physical representation (the spectrum), the pseudospectrum bridges the gap between machine learning and scientific reality. This approach offers a direct and easily comprehensible method for understanding how an AI model interprets chemical data, serving as a valuable alternative to more complex model interpretability tools. The findings validate the pseudospectrum as a crucial tool for unlocking new scientific insights from complex chemical systems.
SERS, Raman spectroscopy, Conv-1D autoencoder, Autoencoders, Transformer Autoencoder
SERS, Raman spectroscopy, Conv-1D autoencoder, Autoencoders, Transformer Autoencoder
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
