
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10698988 , 10.5281/zenodo.11498635 , 10.5281/zenodo.17805735 , 10.5281/zenodo.14184141 , 10.5281/zenodo.16983124 , 10.15454/5ejkas , 10.5281/zenodo.12821585 , 10.5281/zenodo.10719606 , 10.5281/zenodo.17541714 , 10.5281/zenodo.10659711 , 10.5281/zenodo.10784547 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092391 , 10.5281/zenodo.10659710 , 10.5281/zenodo.13786259
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10698988 , 10.5281/zenodo.11498635 , 10.5281/zenodo.17805735 , 10.5281/zenodo.14184141 , 10.5281/zenodo.16983124 , 10.15454/5ejkas , 10.5281/zenodo.12821585 , 10.5281/zenodo.10719606 , 10.5281/zenodo.17541714 , 10.5281/zenodo.10659711 , 10.5281/zenodo.10784547 , 10.5281/zenodo.17092391 , 10.5281/zenodo.10659710 , 10.5281/zenodo.13786259
Data sourceThis dataset was constructed using 30 rabbit fecal samples subjected to deep metagenomic sequencing. Data is published in the Bioproject PRJEB50625 Metagenomic assemblyFirst, sequencing adapters removal and read trimming was performed with fastp. Reads mapped on the host genome (GCF_000001635.27) with bowtie2 were removed with samtools. Finally, Metagenomic assembly was performed with metaSPAdes by processing each sample separately (single-sample assembly). Contigs of less than 1500 bp were removed. MAGs recoveryReads of each sample were aligned against each assembly (30*30 mappings) with bowtie2 and results were indexed in sorted bam files with samtools. For each assembly, contigs coverage across all samples was computed with jgi_summarize_bam_contig_depths. MAGs were generated with MetaBAT 2 and SemiBin v1.3. MAGs quality was assessed with checkM and those with completeness 5% or N50 < 8Kb were discarded.
Health and Life Sciences, Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Medicine, Life Sciences
Health and Life Sciences, Medicine, Health and Life Sciences, Medicine, Life Sciences
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
