Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Preprint . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Quantitative Stability of the L1-Poincaré-Wirtinger Inequality: Information Geometry, Hamiltonian Duality, and the Geometric Uncertainty Principle

Authors: Kokuno, Yumeto; Miroku, Akagi;

Quantitative Stability of the L1-Poincaré-Wirtinger Inequality: Information Geometry, Hamiltonian Duality, and the Geometric Uncertainty Principle

Abstract

Correction and provenance notice (5 August 2026). This published record is retained with its original files and authorship. The common-half-arc selection equality used in the underlying L1 stability proof line is false: an exact rational example has levelwise optimum 4/5 and best common-half-arc cost 9/10. The sharp coefficient 1/4 has a different coarea and nested-core proof in the maintained all-versions record, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.17010427. The wider information-geometric, Hamiltonian, and uncertainty-principle bridges are not audited by this notice and require independent proofs. This record is obsoleted and corrected by 10.5281/zenodo.17010427. The quantitative stability of the L1-Poincaré-Wirtinger inequality on the unit circle is proved, demonstrating that a function's L1-distance to extremizers is directly related to the square root of its deficit. The methodology employs information geometry, interpreting the deficit as a functional on a Riemannian manifold of probability densities. A duality is established between geometric stability (governed by a position-based Hamiltonian and gradient flow) and dynamical stability (governed by a momentum-based Hamiltonian and unitary flow), whchi is then unified through Noncommutative Geometry and implies a Geometric Uncertainty Principle. This shows a fundamental trade-off between maximal geometric and quantum stability.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Green