Views provided by UsageCounts
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.16925
{"references": ["Pierre Lebreton and Alexander Raake and Marcus Barkowsky and Patrick Le Callet, \"Open perceptual binocular and monocular descriptors for stereoscopic 3D images and video characterization\", {I}nternational {W}orkshop on {Q}uality of {M}ultimedia {E}xperience (QoMEX), 2015", "[1] M. S. Landy, L. T. Maloney, E. B. Johnston, and M. Young, \u201cMea- surement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion,\u201d Vision Research, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 389\u2013412, 1995.", "[2] M. Lambooij, W. IJsselsteijn, M. Fortuin, and I. Heynderickx, \u201cVisual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review,\u201d Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 53(3), pp. 1\u201314, 2009.", "[3] W. Chen, J. Fournier, M. Barkowsky, and P. L. Callet, \u201cNew stereo- scopic video shooting rule based on stereoscopic distortion parameters and comfortable viewing zone,\u201d Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXII. Proceedings of the SPIE, vol. 7863, pp. 78631O\u201378631O\u201313, 2011.", "[4] A. R. Reibman, \u201cDesigning a biased specification-based subjective test of image quality,\u201d in Proceeding of the SPIE, Human Vision and Electronic Imaging XX, 2015.", "[5] ITU-T Recommendation P.910, \u201cSubjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications,\u201d 2008.", "[6] H. Sohn, Y. J. Jung, S. Lee, H. W. Park, and andYong Man Ro, \u201cInvestigation of object thickness for visual discomfort prediction in stereoscopic image,\u201d in Proceedings SPIE 8288, Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIII, vol. 8288, 2012.", "[7] S. Toyosawa and T. Kawai, \u201cMeasurement of perceived stereoscopic sensation through disparity metrics and compositions,\u201d in Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV, vol. 9011, San Francisco, California, USA, 2014.", "[8] T.-H. Lin and S.-J. Hu, \u201cPerceived depth analysis for view navigation of stereoscopic three-dimensional models,\u201d Journal of Electronic Imaging, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 043014, 2014.", "[9] P. Lebreton, A. Raake, M. Barkowsky, and P. L. Callet, \u201cEvaluating depth perception of 3D stereoscopic videos,\u201d IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 6, pp. 710\u2013720, October 2012.", "[10] N. Otsu, \u201cA threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,\u201d IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62\u201366, 1979.", "[11] M. Ross and A. Oliva, \u201cEstimating perception of scene layout properties from global image features,\u201d Journal of vision, vol. 10, no. 1, 2010.", "[12] L. Goldmann, T. Ebrahimi, P. Lebreton, and A. Raake, \u201cTowards a descriptive depth index for 3D content : measuring perspective depth cues,\u201d in VPQM, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 2012.", "[13] P. Lebreton, A. Raake, M. Barkowsky, and P. L. Callet, \u201cPerceptual depth indicator for S-3D content based on binocular and monocular cues,\u201d in Asilomar, 2012.", "[14] P. Lebreton, A. Raake, M. Barkovsky, and P. L. Callet, \u201cMeasuring perceived depth in natural images and study of its relation with monocular and binocular depth cues,\u201d in Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXV, San Francisco, California, USA, 2014.", "[15] M. Werlberger, W. Trobin, T. Pock, A. Wedel, D. Cremers, and H. Bischof, \u201cAnisotropic Huber-L1 Optical Fow,\u201d in Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), London, UK, September 2009.", "[16] \u201chttp://vision.middlebury.edu/stereo/eval/.\u201d", "[17] ITU-T Recommendation P.1401, \u201cMethods, metrics and procedures for statistical evaluation, qualification and comparison of objective quality prediction models,\u201d 2012.", "[18] C.-W. Chen and Y.-Y. Chen, \u201cRecovering depth from a single image using spectral energy of the defocused step edge gradient,\u201d in 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 2011, pp. 1981\u20131984."]}
This paper presents a toolbox for monocular and binocular depth estimation and an analysis of performance for some of these. At first, the definition of an appropriate depth indicator (DI) metric for 3D contents is discussed. To this aim, different algorithms from the literature for the characterization of 3D videos are compared. Results show that the simple 7.5 percentile of the disparity map values can already be an indicator, even though it may fail to address several perceptual aspects. In the latter cases, more advanced algorithms presented in this paper may be a better approach. In a second step, monocular depth indicators are described and analyzed in this paper. All code and tools enabling binocular and monocular depth estimation such as depth-map estimation, depth map characterization and monocular depth cue indicator computation is provided open-source. This will enable researchers to further characterize their 3D and 2D contents, for example before running a subjective experiment, or to automatically pre-screen 3D content that is to be presented to a larger number of viewers.
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 2 |

Views provided by UsageCounts