
This quasi-experimental study investigates the effectiveness of engaging writing activities in enhancing the writing competence of Grade 12 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) students at Malvar Senior High School, Batangas, during the current academic year 2024–2025. Two experimental groups participated in different sets of writing activities: Group 1 engaged in comic strip creation and photographic writing prompts, while Group 2 worked with vocabulary challenges and Mad Libs. Writing competence was assessed through vocabulary acquisition, comprehension, grammar usage, and essay construction. A pre-assessment and post-assessment were conducted to measure progress, with statistical analyses using t-tests for dependent and independent means to determine significance. Findings revealed that both groups exhibited improvements across all writing competence indicators. However, Group 1 demonstrated greater progress in comprehension, grammar usage, and essay construction, while Group 2 showed more substantial gains in vocabulary acquisition. The post-test scores of Group 1 were significantly higher than those of Group 2, highlighting the effectiveness of comic strips and photographic prompts in enhancing overall writing competence. The study concludes that engaging writing activities play a crucial role in improving students' writing skills, with different activities yielding varying benefits. It is recommended that educators integrate a mix of these strategies to target specific writing skill areas. Future research should explore the long-term effects of such activities on literacy and their impact on other cognitive skills. Continuous innovation in writing instruction is essential to maintaining student engagement and fostering overall writing competence.
Writing Competence, Vocabulary Acquisition, Comprehension, Grammar Usage, Essay Construction
Writing Competence, Vocabulary Acquisition, Comprehension, Grammar Usage, Essay Construction
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
