Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Project deliverable . 2023
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Scorecard publication on each business case, labs round II

Authors: Martin, Corinne; Small, Angela; Deltenre, Laura; Thompson, Natalie; Seega, Nina; Bastanzi, Giada; Biddau, Fulvio; +10 Authors

Scorecard publication on each business case, labs round II

Abstract

Innovation Labs (ILs) are collaborative spaces that allow participants to challenge dominant or business-as-usual approaches through experimentation and social learning.ILs can vary in format but they typically consist of a series of workshops, conducted over 6 to 9 months. The process follows design thinking, starting with the observation of the status quo and followed by the exploration of innovative solutions. Participants develop a business case, which describes the proposed innovation and the strategy for its implementation. The results are reported in the scorecard summary, and shared with relevant stakeholders in the form of the final report.As part of the second round of Innovation Labs under the NATURANCE project, a series of workshops explored how insurance can support investment in nature-based solutions (NbS) and address climate-related financial challenges. These Labs, hosted by Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership (CISL), Willis Towers Watson (WTW), and Fondazione Centro Euro-Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC), identified regulatory, financial, and operational barriers while fostering cross-sectoral collaboration to develop innovative insurance solutions for climate resilience.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!