
In this corpus-based study, we explore how the similarity of Low Saxon dialectsamong each other and to the state languages Dutch and German has changed fromthe 19th century to today. In particular, we want to investigate if the traditionalclassification into an eastern and a western group is visible in the data and if theLow Saxon dialects can be found to diverge at the Dutch-German border. We apply principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering to n-grams ofcharacters, part of speech tags and morphological features and observe divergentdevelopments at the separate levels. As a reflection of different orthographic traditions, a noticeable distance between Dutch Low Saxon and German Low Saxon canbe attested at the character level. At the PoS and morphological level, we howeverfind a particular closeness between Dutch Low Saxon and the northern dialectsfrom Germany, while we see German Westphalian in an outlier position. A shift towards the state languages can be observed at the PoS level, but the overall distancebetween Dutch Low Saxon and German Low Saxon does not seem to markedlyincrease at the three levels we studied.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
