Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Hyperspectral Canopy Reflectance Data for Aphid-Infested Winter Wheat Classification

Authors: Skendžić, Sandra; Novak, Hrvoje; Lemic, Darija; Pajač Živković, Ivana; Zovko, Monika; Lesic, Vinko; Maričević, Marko;

Hyperspectral Canopy Reflectance Data for Aphid-Infested Winter Wheat Classification

Abstract

This dataset contains full raw spectral reflectance data collected at the canopy level of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L., variety: Bc Opsesija) to assess aphid infestation levels and support machine learning classification models. The data were collected from experimental winter wheat fields (45°44′50.0″N, 15°56′18.8″E) during the 2022 growing season. Study Period: Mid-April to mid-June 2022Location: Bc Institute, Zagreb, CroatiaField Design: 8 plots (10 × 3 m each): 4 plots treated with insecticides (no insect infestation), 4 plots untreated (natural aphid infestation development)Growth Stages Monitored:T1 (Stem elongation–Heading, BBCH 30–55)T2 (Flowering, BBCH 55–59)T3 (Milky grain development, BBCH 69–75)Aphid species recorded: Sitobion avenae, Rhopalosiphum padi, Metopolophium dirhodum, Schizaphis graminumAssessment method: Visual inspection using a magnifying glass and aphid counts recorded per tillerClassification into healthy (below ET) and infested (above ET) categoriesThe economic thresholds (ETs) for aphid infestation were determined based on the plant's growth stage: During T1, the threshold was set at 4 aphids per tiller. At T2, the threshold ranged between 4 and 7 aphids per tiller. During T3, the threshold increased to 8–12 aphids per tiller.Tillers with aphid densities below these thresholds were classified as healthy, whereas those exceeding the thresholds were categorized as aphid-infested.Spectral Data Collection:Instrument: Spectral Evolution® SR-2500 portable spectroradiometerSpectral Range: 350–2500 nmResolution: VIS-NIR (350–1000 nm): 5 nm, SWIR (1000–2500 nm): 22 nmMeasurement Conditions: Taken under sunny, cloud-free, windless conditions. Conducted between 10:00–14:00 for consistent lighting.Calibration: White BaSO₄ reference panel used every 10 scansSampling Approach: Pistol grip fiber holder positioned 50 cm above canopy 25° field of view, covering ~0.2 m² per scanData recorded using Darwin SP V1.5 software.File Structure: Each measurement period (T1, T2, T3) contains two datasets, one for aphid-infested wheat and one for healthy wheat. This raw dataset provides a valuable resource for researchers working on crop stress detection, aphid infestation monitoring, precision agriculture, and spectral data-driven machine learning applications. It can be used for developing vegetation indices, threshold-based detection methods, and spectral classification models.

Keywords

Entomology/trends, Entomology/classification, Entomology/methods, Cereals, Remote sensing, Entomology, Supervised Machine Learning/classification, Spectroscopy

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average