
Symbolic Music, akin to language, can be encoded in discrete symbols. Recent research has extended the application of large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4 and Llama2 to the symbolic music domain including understanding and generation. Yet scant research explores the details of how these LLMs perform on advanced music understanding and conditioned generation, especially from the multi-step reasoning perspective, which is a critical aspect in the conditioned, editable, and interactive human-computer co-creation process. This study conducts a thorough investigation of LLMs' capability and limitations in symbolic music processing. We identify that current LLMs exhibit poor performance in song-level multi-step music reasoning, and typically fail to leverage learned music knowledge when addressing complex musical tasks. An analysis of LLMs' responses highlights distinctly their pros and cons. Our findings suggest achieving advanced musical capability is not intrinsically obtained by LLMs, and future research should focus more on bridging the gap between music knowledge and reasoning, to improve the co-creation experience for musicians.
Accepted by ISMIR2024
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Sound (cs.SD), Computer Science - Computation and Language, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Computer Science - Sound, Computer Science - Multimedia, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing, Multimedia (cs.MM)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Sound (cs.SD), Computer Science - Computation and Language, Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS), FOS: Electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering, Computation and Language (cs.CL), Computer Science - Sound, Computer Science - Multimedia, Electrical Engineering and Systems Science - Audio and Speech Processing, Multimedia (cs.MM)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
