Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ ZENODOarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: ZENODO
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC 0
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Knowledge bases for explainable benchmarking (QALD10, QALD9+DB, QALD9+WK)

Authors: Zhang, Quannian; Röder, Michael; Srivastava, Nikit; Kouagou, N'Dah Jean; Ngonga Ngomo, Axel-Cyrille;

Knowledge bases for explainable benchmarking (QALD10, QALD9+DB, QALD9+WK)

Abstract

This project provides three knowledge graphs that we created for the three QA benchmarks: QALD-9 plus DBpedia, QALD-9 plus Wikidata, and QALD-10. Here are some more details: 1. Preprocessing We remove all questions from the three QA datasets that have an empty ground truth answer set. We preprocessed the DBpedia reference graph by: Removing 43,618 triples with IRIs that do not pass through the RDF checker. Removing properties of the http://dbpedia.org/property/ namespace. Inferring the classes of all entities based on the class hierarchy. We preprocessed Wikidata by replacing the property http://www.wikidata.org/prop/direct/P31 with http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf\textbackslash-syntax-ns\#type. 2. Knowledge Base Structure In the first step of our benchmarking framework, we generate a knowledge graph comprising information from the dataset used during the benchmarking process. Our work relies on the QALD datasets, which include three types of data for each question: Natural language questionEach question comes with a representation in several languages. From the English question, we extract linguistic features such as: The length of the question (dqb:hasLength) Note: The prefix dqb: refers to the namespacehttp://w3id.org/dice-research/qa-bench#. The presence of negation (dqb:hasNegation) The question word (dqb:hasQuestionWord) The NLP parse tree (dqb:hasNlpParseTreeRoot)Note: We employ the Stanford NLP toolkit for the extraction. Answer(s)Each question comes with the ground truth answers. We add these answers to the generated graph with three different properties distinguishing: IRI answers (dqb:hasIRIAnswer) Boolean answers (dqb:hasBooleanAnswer) Other literal answers (dqb:hasLiteralAnswer)For each IRI listed as an answer, we add its concise bounded description (CBD) extracted from the reference knowledge graph. SPARQL queryEach question has a SPARQL query that returns the ground truth answer when used on the reference knowledge graph. We adopt LSQ to add the following SPARQL query features to our knowledge graph: Entities (dqb:hasEntity), properties (dqb:hasProperty) contained in the query, and the CBD of the entities Type of query The number of triple patterns The number of basic graph patterns The average degree of vertices The median degree of vertices involved in join operations The minimum, maximum, and median number of triple patterns in a basic graph pattern The presence of certain keywords such as FILTER, DISTINCT, and GROUP BY

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average