The SWOT analysis suggests that the engagement of SPCs is key for developing andestablishing eLTER as a persistent and relevant infrastructure that broadly caters to the needsin ecosystem science and adjacent fields. They have important roles both as ambassadors andlinks to local stakeholders and site/platform staff. Moreover, they are also well-positioned toprovide strategic advice on prioritized needs and effective measures to enhance the quality,coordination and synergies between the variable sites and platforms that participate in eLTER.There are already now many such needs articulated related to e.g. training, governance anddata management, as well as centralized support for coordinated development of tools andhow to include the socioeconomic dimensions in the local operations. SPCs are the true localexperts and their voice needs to be strong in eLTER, else their commitment may decline overtime with likely repercussions for long-term station and stakeholder engagement. For manySPCs, the value of liasing with water management authorities and environmental monitoringis recognized as a means to secure long-term funding for one thing. Also, the occurrence andvalue of cooperating with complementing EU-projects and research infrastructures is anaspect that affects the work of SPCs. Both now and in a future eLTER ERIC, the SPF can be a key important instrument forharnessing the considerable experience and commitment of SPCs. A strong and wellcoordinated SPF will also increase the prospect of having long-term stable support fromnational stakeholders and local host organizations.