Downloads provided by UsageCounts
Simultaneous strain gage measurements of sixty porous disk models, in a scaled wind farm with one hundred models, and for fifty-six different layouts. For detailed information about the experimental setup and wind farm layouts see: Bossuyt, J., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2018). Effect of layout on asymptotic boundary layer regime in deep wind farms. Physical Review Fluids. See also: https://arxiv.org/abs/1808.09579 . For more information about the experimental design of the porous disk models, see also: Bossuyt, J., Howland, M. F., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2017). Measurement of unsteady loading and power output variability in a micro wind farm model in a wind tunnel. Experiments in Fluids, 58(1), 1. http://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2278-6 Bossuyt, J., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2017). Wind farm power fluctuations and spatial sampling of turbulent boundary layers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 823, 329-344. http://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.328 The data contains matrices 'WF_U', 'x', and 'y', and variable 'fs' for each layout. The matrix 'WF_U' contains the reconstructed velocity signal in m/s measured by each porous disk, and has size ( 20 , 3 , number of time samples), with 20 the number of porous disk rows, and 3 the number of streamwise aligned porous disk columns in the wind farm. Matrices 'x', and 'y' have size (20,3) and contain the locations of each instrumented porous disk in units of disk diameter D = 0.03m. It is important to note that the wind farm has one extra column of non-instrumented porous disk models on each side, for a total of 20x5=100 porous disk models.The variable 'fs' contains the sampling frequency in Hz, at which all 60 porous disks are simultaneously sampled. -------------------------------------------------------- Example code to load data in Matlab : -------------------------------------------------------- filename = 'U_C1_1.h5'; fileID = H5F.open(filename,'H5F_ACC_RDONLY','H5P_DEFAULT'); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'WF_U'); WF_U = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'fs'); fs = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'x'); x = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'y'); y = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); H5F.close(fileID); -------------------------------------------------------- Example code to load data in Python: -------------------------------------------------------- import h5py filename = 'U_C1_1.h5' f = h5py.File(filename, 'r') U = f['WF_U'][()] x = f['x'][()] y = f['y'][()] fs = f['fs'][0][0] f.close() -------------------------------------------------------- Example code to generate figures 15 and 16 of Bossuyt et al. (2018). Effect of layout on asymptotic boundary layer regime in deep wind farms. Physical Review Fluids, in Matlab -------------------------------------------------------- WF_cases_selected = 1:7; folder = '/';% folder with files WF_cases_l = {'U_C1';'U_C2';'NU1_C1';'NU1_C2';'NU2_C1';'NU2_C2';'NU2_C3'};% name of layout variations WF_cases_n = [6, 7, 11, 8, 11, 7, 6]; % 'number of layout variations for each case WF_data.x = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1);% x - coordinates of porous disk locations WF_data.y = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1);% y - coordinates of porous disk locations WF_data.shift = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1);% spanwise shift of layout series WF_data.fs = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1); WF_data.WF_Pm = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1); WF_data.WF_Um = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1); WF_data.WF_U_rms = cell( length(WF_cases_selected) , 1); for i = 1 : length(WF_cases_selected) WF_data_case = struct; WF_data_case.x = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.y = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.shift = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.fs = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.WF_Pm = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.WF_Um = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); WF_data_case.WF_U_rms = cell( WF_cases_n(i) , 1); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) clc i j WF_data_var = struct; %read the file filename = [folder WF_cases_l{i} '_' num2str(j) '.h5']; fileID = H5F.open(filename,'H5F_ACC_RDONLY','H5P_DEFAULT'); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'WF_U'); WF_data_var.WF_U = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'fs'); WF_data_case.fs{j} = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'x'); WF_data_case.x{j} = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); datasetID = H5D.open(fileID,'y'); WF_data_case.y{j} = H5D.read(datasetID,'H5ML_DEFAULT','H5S_ALL','H5S_ALL','H5P_DEFAULT'); H5D.close(datasetID); H5F.close(fileID); WF_data_var.WF_P = WF_data_var.WF_U.^3; % Time averaged power WF_data_case.WF_Pm{j} = mean(WF_data_var.WF_P,3); % normalize by power in first row: Pi/P1 WF_data_case.WF_Pm{j} = WF_data_case.WF_Pm{j}./mean(WF_data_case.WF_Pm{j}(1,:)); % Time averaged velocity WF_data_case.WF_Um{j} = mean(WF_data_var.WF_U,3); % u_rms --> TI WF_data_case.WF_U_rms{j} = std(WF_data_var.WF_U,[],3); end WF_data.x{i} = WF_data_case.x; WF_data.y{i} = WF_data_case.y; WF_data.fs{i} = WF_data_case.fs; WF_data.WF_Pm{i} = WF_data_case.WF_Pm; WF_data.WF_Um{i} = WF_data_case.WF_Um; WF_data.WF_U_rms{i} = WF_data_case.WF_U_rms; %determine spanwise shift for plot legends tmp1 = WF_data.y{i}{j-1}; tmp2 = WF_data.y{i}{j}; dy = diff( [tmp1(:,1) tmp2(:,1)] ,1,2); dy = max(dy(abs(dy)>0)); WF_data.shift{i} = 0:dy:(WF_cases_n(i)-1)*dy; end %% line_tick = {'o-','*-','+-','d-','s-','^-','v-','<-','>-','p-','h-'}; line_color = [51,160,44; 141,211,199; 31,120,180; 106,61,154; 227,26,28; 177,89,40; 255,127,0; 166,206,227]./255; legend_items = cell(size(WF_cases_selected)); for i = 1:length(legend_items) legend_items{i} = strrep(WF_cases_l{i},'_','-'); end %% average power entire farm row_start = 1; row_end = 19; f1 = figure; set(gcf,'paperposition',[0,0,8.4,4.9]) hold on for i = 1 : length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_P = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_P(j) = mean(mean( WF_data.WF_Pm{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:))); end plot( WF_data.shift{i} , tmp_P, line_tick{i} ,'Color', line_color(i,:) ,'MarkerFaceColor', line_color(i,:) ) end % manualy plot errorbars for i = 1:length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_P = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_P(j) = mean(mean( WF_data.WF_Pm{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:))); end px = WF_data.shift{i} ; py = tmp_P; pw = 0.05; pe = zeros(size(px))+0.01;%for uncertainty value see Bossuyt et al. (2018) Physical Review Fluids. for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)+pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)-pe(j) py(j)-pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j) px(j)],[py(j)-pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],':', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) end end xlabel('\Delta_y [D]') ylabel('$\langle P_i /P_1\rangle_{1}^{19}$','Interpreter','Latex') box('on') ylim([0.35 0.66]) xlim([-0.1 2.6]) legend1 = legend(legend_items'); set(legend1,'Location','southeast'); print(f1, 'WF_Pm_all','-dpng','-r300') %% average power end of farm row_start = 16; row_end = 19; f2 = figure; set(gcf,'paperposition',[0,0,8.4,4.9]) hold on for i = 1 : length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_P = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_P(j) = mean(mean( WF_data.WF_Pm{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:))); end plot( WF_data.shift{i} , tmp_P, line_tick{i} ,'Color', line_color(i,:) ,'MarkerFaceColor', line_color(i,:) ) end % manualy plot errorbars for i = 1:length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_P = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_P(j) = mean(mean( WF_data.WF_Pm{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:))); end px = WF_data.shift{i} ; py = tmp_P; pw = 0.05; pe = zeros(size(px))+0.02; %for uncertainty value see Bossuyt et al. (2018) Physical Review Fluids. for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)+pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)-pe(j) py(j)-pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j) px(j)],[py(j)-pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],':', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) end end xlabel('\Delta_y [D]') ylabel('$\langle P_i /P_1\rangle_{16}^{19}$','Interpreter','Latex') box('on') ylim([0.27 0.52]) xlim([-0.1 2.6]) legend1 = legend(legend_items'); set(legend1,'Location','southeast'); print(f2, 'WF_Pm_end', '-dpng','-r300') %% plot average unsteady loading total farm row_start = 1; row_end = 19; f3 = figure; set(gcf,'paperposition',[0,0,8.4,4.9]) hold on for i = 1 : length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_TI = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_TI(j) = mean(mean(WF_data.WF_U_rms{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)./WF_data.WF_Um{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)))*100; end plot( WF_data.shift{i} , tmp_TI , line_tick{i} ,'Color', line_color(i,:) ,'MarkerFaceColor', line_color(i,:)) end % manualy plot errorbars for i = 1:length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_TI = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_TI(j) = mean(mean(WF_data.WF_U_rms{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)./WF_data.WF_Um{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)))*100; end px = WF_data.shift{i} ; py = tmp_TI; pw = 0.05; pe = zeros(size(px))+ 0.004*tmp_TI;%for uncertainty value see Bossuyt et al. (2018) Physical Review Fluids. for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)+pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)-pe(j) py(j)-pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j) px(j)],[py(j)-pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],':', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) end end xlabel('\Delta_y [D]') ylabel('$ \langle TI \rangle_{1}^{19} [\%]$','Interpreter','Latex') box('on') xlim([-0.1 2.6]) legend1 = legend(legend_items'); set(legend1,'Location','northeast'); print(f3, 'WF_TI_all','-dpng','-r300') %% plot average unsteady loading end of farm row_start = 16; row_end = 19; f4 = figure; set(gcf,'paperposition',[0,0,8.4,4.9]) hold on for i = 1 : length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_TI = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_TI(j) = mean(mean(WF_data.WF_U_rms{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)./WF_data.WF_Um{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)))*100; end plot( WF_data.shift{i} , tmp_TI , line_tick{i} ,'Color', line_color(i,:) ,'MarkerFaceColor', line_color(i,:)) end % manualy plot errorbars for i = 1:length(WF_cases_selected) tmp_TI = zeros(size(WF_data.shift{i})); for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) tmp_TI(j) = mean(mean(WF_data.WF_U_rms{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)./WF_data.WF_Um{i}{j}(row_start:row_end,:)))*100; end px = WF_data.shift{i} ; py = tmp_TI; pw = 0.05; pe = zeros(size(px))+ 0.01*tmp_TI;%for uncertainty value see Bossuyt et al. (2018) Physical Review Fluids. for j = 1:WF_cases_n(i) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)+pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j)-pw/2 px(j)+pw/2] , [py(j)-pe(j) py(j)-pe(j)],'-', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) plot( [px(j) px(j)],[py(j)-pe(j) py(j)+pe(j)],':', 'Color', line_color(i,:),'LineWidth',0.5) end end xlabel('\Delta_y [D]') ylabel('$ \langle TI \rangle_{16}^{19} [\%]$','Interpreter','Latex') box('on') xlim([-0.1 2.6]) legend1 = legend(legend_items'); set(legend1,'Location','northeast'); print(f4, 'WF_TI_end','-dpng','-r300')
{"references": ["Bossuyt, J., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2018). Effect of layout on asymptotic boundary layer regime in deep wind farms. Physical Review Fluids.", "Bossuyt, J., Howland, M. F., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2017). Measurement of unsteady loading and power output variability in a micro wind farm model in a wind tunnel.\u00a0Experiments in Fluids,\u00a058(1), 1.\u00a0http://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-016-2278-6", "Bossuyt, J., Meneveau, C., & Meyers, J. (2017). Wind farm power fluctuations and spatial sampling of turbulent boundary layers.\u00a0Journal of Fluid Mechanics,\u00a0823, 329-344.\u00a0http://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.328"]}
wind tunnel experiment, wind farm, porous disk, strain gage, layout
wind tunnel experiment, wind farm, porous disk, strain gage, layout
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
| views | 33 | |
| downloads | 29 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts