
In this presentation, Joanne Fitzpatrick discusses some of the ways in which small & medium-sized presses can 'get started' with improving the accesibility of their OA ebooks. Fitzpatrick explores legislation and requirements, and the various places in which accessibility must be monitored and supported. Fitzpatrick asks, to what extent have (or will) publisher workflows need to change in order to improve accessibility in OA books? Can small publishers meet and exceed legislative requirements? And, what barriers make this challenging? The presentation concludes by reviewing some of the tools available to support publishers, exploring both their benefits and limitations. This presentation was delivered as part of Copim's "Publishing Workshop: Accessibility, Archiving and Metadata" on 27 November 2024. The workshop was co-organised by several groups currently collaborating on Copim's Open Book Futures project: Thoth Open Metadata, the project's Archiving & Preservation work package, and the project's Accessibility work package. The workshop was attended by representatives from 12 different publishing organisations, who kindly shared their knowledge and experience.
The Open Book Futures project is co-funded by Arcadia and Research England Development (RED) Fund (UKRI). Arcadia is a charitable foundation that works to protect nature, preserve cultural heritage and promote open access to knowledge. Since 2002 Arcadia has awarded more than $1 billion to organizations around the world. Research England Development (RED) Fund (UKRI) is a fund supporting institutional-level innovative projects in research and knowledge exchange including collaborations between education providers and between education providers and business.
Publishing, Open Access, Books, Accessibility
Publishing, Open Access, Books, Accessibility
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
